How Rahul’s ‘fighting Indian state’ remarks will hurt Congress further

New Delhi: Congress MP and the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has long been known for making statements that stir controversy, often casting doubt on his grasp of politics and governance. 

For over twenty years, his comments have been largely considered naive, but his recent claim of "fighting the Indian State" has intensified scrutiny around him.

During a public address on Wednesday, Gandhi stated, "We are fighting against the BJP, RSS, and the Indian State itself," suggesting that his battle transcends traditional political rivalry. 

This assertion has raised significant concerns regarding his intentions and ideological stance.

No more innocence

Gandhi's language has taken a turn reminiscent of Maoist ideology, signaling a shift from perceived naivety to a more deliberate provocation. His position within the constitution makes this statement particularly troubling, as it appears to show a profound disrespect for the nation's integrity. This is no longer seen as a spur-of-the-moment comment but as part of a calculated strategy, moving beyond the realm of simple ignorance.

Challenging national unity

Gandhi has previously challenged the concept of India's unity, famously declaring that "India is not a nation" but merely "a union of states." This perspective undermines the essence of Indian nationalism, indicating his opposition to the idea of a cohesive nation-state. His latest remarks only reinforce the view that he does not align with the vision of a united India.

Assault on national symbols

By positioning himself against the Indian State, Gandhi indirectly criticizes the symbols that unify the nation, including its flag, anthem, and constitution. This rhetoric strikes at the heart of India's sovereignty and the integrity of its diverse society, potentially causing rifts in the secular fabric of the country.

Disregard for constitutional norms

Under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution, the State includes all legislative and executive entities, from Parliament to local bodies. Gandhi's declaration of a fight against the State challenges these institutions, from the Lok Sabha to the Supreme Court, weakening the democratic structure at its core.

History of controversy

Gandhi's past actions, including the dramatic tearing of a cabinet proposal during the UPA government and his interactions with foreign dignitaries at sensitive times, including Chinese officials, have already raised questions about his judgment. These incidents have only deepened the skepticism regarding his motives.

Questionable associations

His engagements range from meeting with operatives allegedly linked to the CIA to associating with figures like Ilhan Omar, known for her critical stance on India. These interactions suggest a pattern of aligning with those who challenge India's sovereignty, casting further doubt on his allegiance to national interests.

Undermining national cohesion

Gandhi's statements not only tarnish India's international image but also threaten its secular and democratic foundations. His rhetoric could alienate various communities, foster division, and empower anti-national forces.

Demand for clarity

Following his provocative stance against the Indian State, the nation awaits an explanation from Rahul Gandhi. What drives this apparent animosity towards a country that has bestowed his family with its highest political honors? In an era where India seeks unity and strong leadership, his comments sow discord and mistrust, potentially damaging the reputation of his long-standing political party.