/newsdrum-in/media/member_avatars/9Rj3p38eDEeibqzKtTLR.jpg )
/newsdrum-in/media/media_files/2025/04/21/CaudUXXZDnNLbQOzEJsp.jpg)
Poet Aamir Aziz
New Delhi: Four years after it caught headlines in the context of the anti-CAA protests across the country in 2021, poet Aamir Aziz's revolutionary text "Sab Yaad Rakha Jayega" is back at the centre of debate on the "rage against injustice".
Aziz put out a series of social media posts across various platforms on Sunday to allege that renowned artist Anita Dube has used his poem without his "knowledge, consent, credit, or compensation" in her works currently exhibited at Vadehra Art Gallery in the national capital.
Dube's ongoing show, "Three Storey House", showcases her recent body of works, including sculptures, mixed-media compositions, and a kinetic installation.
Responding to Aziz's allegations, the gallery expressed the hope that the issue between the two artists can be "resolved in an amicable and constructive manner".
"We have been in touch with Aamir Aziz and his legal representatives for over a month. This is a situation that we have taken very seriously. We immediately ensured that the works Aamir Aziz has concerns with were not offered for sale. We remain committed to all artists and their creative expressions, and for building respectful dialogue across the art community," the gallery said in a statement.
Dube said that she will respond to the allegation "after discussion with her lawyers".
In his posts, across social media platforms, Aziz wrote that a friend called him on March 18 after seeing his words stitched into a work on display at the Vadehra Art Gallery.
"That was the first time I learned Anita Dube had taken my poem and turned it into her 'art'," Aziz said.
My name is Aamir Aziz. I am a poet.
— Aamir Aziz (@AamirAzizJmi) April 20, 2025
My poem Sab Yaad Rakha Jayega has been used without my knowledge, consent, credit, or compensation by the internationally celebrated artist Anita Dube.
He said that upon confronting, Dube made it "seem normal like lifting a living poet’s work, branding it into her own, and selling it in elite galleries for lakhs of rupees was normal".
"And the irony? The poem raged against injustice. Anita Dube turned it into a luxury commodity—proof not only that injustice is alive, but that it now wears silk gloves and sells itself as art. That a poem written in defiance was gutted, defanged, and stitched into velvet for profit," the Jamia Millia Islamia alumnus said.
Aziz had composed the poem in 2020 in response to the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens. It reached international popularity when Pink Floyd's musician Roger Waters recited the poem's translation at an event in London.
In his posts on social media, Aziz went on to say that Dube had been using the poem since as early as 2023 in an exhibition titled "Of Mimicry, Mimesis and Masquerade, curated by Arshiya Lokhandwala," that was later displayed at the India Art Fair this year.
"She didn’t mention this in our first conversation. She hid it. Deliberately. Let’s be clear: if someone holds my poem in a placard at a protest, a rally, a people’s uprising, I stand with them. But this is not that," Aziz said.
He added that his poem "Written in velvet cloth, another carved in wood, hung inside a commercial white cube space, renamed, rebranded, and resold at an enormous price without ever telling me".
"This is not solidarity. This is not homage. This is not conceptual borrowing. This is theft. This is erasure. This is entitled section of the art world doing what it does best extracting, consuming, profiting while pretending radical," the 35-year-old said.
Terming it "outright cultural extraction and plunder", Aziz said it stripped authors of autonomy "while profiting off their voices, especially those from marginalised backgrounds".
"Their work is used without their knowledge, precisely so they can be excluded from the wealth produced through it. I have sent legal notices. Demanded answers. Asked for accountability.
"In return: silence, half-truths, and insulting offers." He also claimed that the gallery refused to take the work down even when asked to.
"What Anita Dube has done isn’t a gesture of solidarity or resistance, it’s the oldest trick in the book, inherited from the same colonial masters: steal the voice, erase the name, and sell the illusion of originality. It is the systematic erasure of authorship in favour of profit," Aziz alleged.